fbpx

HOMEPORTAL

property prices

Bank of Canada STATED: lower home prices are necessary for economic stability

Bank of Canada STATED: lower home prices are necessary for economic stability Topping the list of Canada’s 99 concerns is it’s over $2 trillion in mortgage debt. Earlier today, Senior Deputy Governor of the Bank of Canada (BoC) Carolyn Rogers responded to worries over the country’s financial stability. She summed it up by focusing on two issues that have been around for a while but are mounting: consumer debt and the property market. She cautioned that homeowners may feel the effects of these measures over the next several months, but that they are important to bring the country’s markets back into equilibrium. RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE AND CONSUMER DEBT ARE A MAJOR RISK TO CANADA’S ECONOMIC GROWTH AND STABILITY When speaking about threats to financial stability, the senior deputy governor of the Bank of Canada zeroed primarily on consumer debt and housing prices. They stressed that neither issue is a recent development, pointing out that it has been discussed in central bank studies as far back as 2006. Despite the fact that no major catastrophe has occurred as of yet, growing systemic vulnerability is cause for alarm. What would have been a manageable problem in 2006 has ballooned into a major crisis because the Canadian economy is so dependent on the housing market. Prior to the epidemic, Rogers said, there were serious worries about cost and investor speculation. Issues that had previously only been affecting Toronto and Vancouver became national crises as the pandemic spread. In most markets, home values increased by over 50% in just over two years. She noted that “housing activity,” measured by the number of homes bought and sold, was roughly 30% greater than pre-pandemic levels. An essential clarification, as this wasn’t a time of low activity that low rates were attempting to boost. The market keeps adding fuel to the fire of stimulation provided by historically low-interest rates. FRONT-LOADING RATE INCREASES WILL LOWER RATES The simplest approach to guarantee a larger inflation spike is to pump the gas while the economy is thriving. Inflation had already reached sky-high levels before the invasion of Ukraine. A crisis exacerbated the difficulty of moving slowly, making swift action necessary. In order to quickly calm the economy and keep inflation expectations anchored, we have raised interest rates significantly. said Rogers, “greater rises in the future can be avoided.” She didn’t go into detail, but this is basic monetary policy. Inflationary pressures from interest rates will increase the longer it takes to raise them in an effort to rein in overheated demand. The resulting cycle of inflation and countermeasures is dubbed an “inflationary spiral” and is difficult to reverse. There are preliminary indicators that the monetary policy is having the desired effect, but we still have a ways to go until inflation returns to its target level. Sadly, there are unpleasant consequences to this transition. And we’re aware of that,” she said. FOR AN ADEQUATE BALANCE, CANADIAN HOME PRICES MUST FALL Canadian homeowners, especially those who were duped into assuming that current low-interest rates would persist for much longer, have been dealing with the aftermath. She pointed out that, while not a huge percentage of households, a larger than usual number had chosen to obtain mortgages with adjustable interest rates. Buyers today face interest rates that are substantially higher than they had bargained for, with interest eating up a growing portion of their original payments. Borrowers with fixed rates won’t feel the effects of rate hikes until it’s time to renew their loans. In a nutshell, property prices are going up significantly. Furthermore, a toxic market has developed due to the excessive lending that initially boosted investor demand and housing prices. To return to her original point, the 50% increase in property prices has exacerbated the affordability crisis that prospective buyers were already confronting. It’s not only in major cities like Toronto and Vancouver; it’s happening all around the country. Today, the Bank of Canada (BoC) unexpectedly acknowledged that housing prices are technically overvalued and would need to fall. The deputy governor has stated, “We need reduced house prices to restore balance to Canada’s housing market and make home ownership more attainable to more Canadians.” And he continued, “But reduced housing prices may increase stress for individuals who purchased recently. They’ll have less equity, which could make it harder for them to refinance. The least disruption will be seen by short-term end users because they won’t be leaving their current role for a long time. However, there may be instant liquidity difficulties for investors who considered extremely immediate bets. Especially if they’re part of the pre-sale market and haven’t yet taken possession of the home they’ve purchased. Related posts. How does a home warranty differ from an insurance policy? Read More Deposit Protection Eases Homebuying Stress Read More Importance of the performance audit Read More How can Home Warranty Guard You Against Unexpected Expenses Read More Canada hopes to welcome half a million immigrants by 2025, but can the country keep up? Read More Canadian Real Estate Prices Fall 30%, Recession Starts: Ox Econ Read More

Bank of Canada STATED: lower home prices are necessary for economic stability Read More »

The Canadian Blind Bidding Ban Dilemma

The Canadian Blind Bidding Ban Dilemma Before getting into the ban of blind bidding in Canada let us first understand what we mean by blind bidding. What does a blind bid mean? Blind bidding is a method of bidding for a property without knowing the size of opposing bids. When a property is listed and an offer date is set, a blind offer is made. On the offer date, all interested parties gather at the property or at the brokerage of the listing agent to make their best offer. You’ll add the price you’re willing to pay as well as any conditions you have or are willing to eliminate in your offer (such as the home inspection or financing). Because no one knows how much the other potential buyers are offering, it’s dubbed a ‘blind offer.’ As a result, you only have one chance to determine what it will take to ‘win’ the property. Thus some say it’s one of the factors contributing to skyrocketing property prices. How is it different from normal bidding? In most other bidding wars, you’ll have the chance to go back and forth a few times to try to outbid the other possible purchasers. However, there is no transparency with a blind offer. It’s like high-stakes poker, but with real estate as the stakes. You have no idea what your competitors will offer, thus you have no notion where you stand with your own proposal The main disadvantage of blind bidding Because there is no disclosure of what others may be proposing, the ‘winning’ offer maybe thousands of dollars higher than it has to be due to a lack of transparency. For instance, Buyer A might offer $15,000 more than the asking price, Buyer B might offer $18,000 more, and Buyer C might offer $40,000 more. Instead, Buyer C could have won by offering just $18,001 more than the asking price, putting them out $21,999. As a result of the lack of transparency, Buyer C felt compelled to make a hyper-offer in order to win the bidding war. Thus in Canada where blind bidding is more common, the Government is looking to ban this system to protect its buyers. The issue of blind bidding in Canada Bidding wars, particularly blind bidding, have recently come under scrutiny as Canadians become increasingly disillusioned with the home-buying process. The blind bidding method, according to critics in the real estate market, allows for manipulation by bad faith realtors as well as out-of-control bidding situations that push up prices. Finally, they claim that blind bidding is not in the consumer’s best interests. These opponents frequently advocate for the implementation of a more transparent open bidding mechanism. The Canadian government is considering prohibiting blind bidding. The proposed restriction would put an end to the practice of blind bidding across Canada’s provinces and territory. The purpose, according to the government, is to promote openness in the real estate acquisition process, prohibit buyers from overpaying excessively, and keep home prices from soaring. So why are some industries skeptical about this actually becoming the rule? According to a recent analysis, proponents of blind bidding think that this type of bidding does not lead to price increases in residential real estate, however moving to open bidding in a hot real estate market could worsen price escalation. Housing prices have risen quicker in some nations where open bidding or open discussions are permitted, such as Australia, New Zealand, and Sweden, than in Canada, according to the analysis. According to the paper, “it is difficult to establish that blind bidding is connected with higher residential real-estate values” based on recent price fluctuations. While Canada has seen some of the fastest real-estate price increases in the world, open bidding for homes in New Zealand has seen an even faster rise. If numerous purchasers pay more than necessary for homes for a while based on the sale prices of similar properties, demand will eventually be satisfied, and the remaining buyers in the market will either refuse to pay or will be unable to pay prices at the current level. By definition, market value exists when there are enough buyers willing to pay the newly raised prices, and the market is operating freely and properly. When prices grow to the point that no one can or will buy a home, prices begin to plummet. This form of market overheating is just momentary. Only a small percentage of properties receive offers that far outnumber all other competing offers. It is a large percentage in some places during hot sellers’ markets, but it is statistically a small minority and thus not a major driver of rising housing values over time. We don’t always have a strong seller’s market. Even if prohibiting blind bidding had some effect on home values, it would do so only during the few times when the bulk of homes receives competitive offers. For long periods of time in various Canadian cities, severe sellers’ markets have persisted. But now in most Canadian local markets, intense sellers’ markets, in which supply falls well short of demand, are uncommon. But the strongest argument given by the proponents is the seller’s right to choose how their property should get sold. Why are open offers not the solutions? When purchasers don’t know what other bidders are offering (as is the case in the blind bidding system), they just make their best offer. Today, there are no bidding wars as in reality, now there is no bidding. Based on the level of competition, buyers make their best offer. When there’s nothing to bid against, you can’t bid. Buyers compete against one another in open offers. Open offers, by definition, generate an auction and lead to bidding wars. Conclusion The final sale price under a closed offer system is sometimes significantly greater than the second highest offer received. That does not necessarily imply that the successful buyer paid more than they “should have.” It simply indicates that the next highest buyer either did not

The Canadian Blind Bidding Ban Dilemma Read More »

Central banks squeezing into bear market

Central banks squeezing into bear market Inflation that is out of control is a problem for developed economies since they keep making the same mistakes with their monetary policies. As the state of the economy continues to worsen, monetary policy is becoming more restrictive as extra pressures from the outside world are driving inflation to even higher levels. According to the international forecasting agency Oxford Economics, this is the exact reverse of what often takes place. Rate reductions are often used to assist make a soft landing when the economy begins to slow down. They warn that things won’t be the same this time. The company has reduced its projections for future growth, and the downside risks have become even more prominent. The world’s central banks are taking their fight against inflation more seriously, which necessitates a reduction in economic growth. Oxford Economics, a global forecasting agency, has issued a warning that there will be a need to kerb economic development. That is really unfortunate news. The reduction of inflation is receiving significant attention from the world’s central banks, which is encouraging. Even in the absence of other contributing factors, high inflation can bring about a recession because it lowers consumer spending. A mild recession would not compare to the devastation that would be caused by an inflationary recession. When events like this take place, not only does the cost of living go up, but so does the unemployment rate. If central banks are successful in controlling high inflation, they should also be able to control more traditional forms of inflation. The worst form of recessions are ones that are caused by inflation. Ask your grandparents. “Central banks have changed the way that they react to economic conditions, focusing largely on current inflation and its impact on expectations at the expense of future growth,” wrote Innes McFee, Chief Global Economist at Oxford Economics. “Central banks have changed the way that they react to economic conditions.” Both rising interest rates and rising inflation are detrimental to economic growth. As a result of inflation’s negative impact on consumption, more producers who rely on consumer discretion have decreased revenue. At the same time, increased interest rates will lead to a rise in the cost of capital and a reduction in leverage. It’s an unusual combination, and the best-case situation probably involves only a little bit of growth management. The remedy that is being considered is higher interest rates, which would come at the expense of growth. “Their concern right now is that excessive inflation could have an effect on expectations and, as a result, wages, which would further ingrain inflation. This move is the cause for downgrades to our predictions for advanced economies’ growth in the second half of 2022 and 2023, as well as upgrades to our forecasts for policy rates,” he adds. The effect of wealth is about to have the opposite effect, which will be losses. The behavioural observation that individuals spend more money when they have a greater perception of their own wealth is referred to as a wealth effect. If they were able to make a significant amount of money from their stocks or property, even if it was only on paper, they are more at ease with their spending. If and when it happens, we might see a wealth effect in the opposite direction. When this occurs, consumers cease spending out of fear of losing money, and as a result, we see an increase in the percentage of people saving. In the following months, one might anticipate a wealth impact that will work in the opposite direction as inflated valuations fall. The financial advisory firm run by McFee anticipates a decline of 25 percent in global equity prices and a loss of 5 percent in housing prices. Keep in mind that this refers to the increase in housing prices worldwide. The company forecasts that countries with more frothy economies will have considerably greater corrections. Recent projections made in Canada indicate that prices will fall by 24 percent by 2024 and then level off after that. Because higher inefficiencies call for larger remedies, they have issued a warning that the correction might not take place. But in the case of Canada, if property prices continue to rise at this rate, the country runs the risk of triggering a financial crisis. Both the wealth effect backward and inflation will have a large negative impact on global GDP. The McFee model predicts that the reverse wealth effect will cause a reduction in GDP of between 0.3 and 0.6 percentage points. Although not the largest decrease, this is in no way an improvement. Despite the fact that that might be an optimistic stance, the company suggests. Be prepared for downward revisions to the forecasts of global growth. The behaviour of central banks has become less predictable as the fight against inflation has become a higher priority. It was difficult to make an accurate prediction on the outcome of the rate increase of 0.75 points that was being considered. As a consequence of this, the company is unable to make projections on the course of action that policymakers ought to be taking, but rather the course of action that they have presented to the public. McFee anticipates that downward adjustments will increase as central banks continue to take active action against inflation. According to him, “overall, our predictions have been adapting to this new reality,” and in the July forecast round, “we expect to make higher revisions to policy rates and downward revisions to growth.” When an economic cycle has reached its point of maximum expansion, there is both good news and negative news to report. After some initial upheaval, however, interest rates will begin to decline. Because the economy is currently in the mature phase of the cycle, a recession and lower interest rates are virtually certain in the near future. It is generally safe to conclude that the stimulus measures taken during the next recession will not be quite

Central banks squeezing into bear market Read More »