fbpx

HOMEPORTAL

Menu

Housing

Canadian real estate prices will “rip” higher: SCOTIABANK

Blogs / / / , , , , , , ,

Canadian real estate prices will “rip” higher: SCOTIABANK Canadian real estate may be sluggish right now, but a major bank believes it will “rip” shortly. According to a recent Scotiabank study, the Federal government is at conflict with the Bank of Canada’s (BoC) aims. The country’s central bank is attempting to restrict demand and thereby inflation, while the Fed is doing everything possible to stimulate excess demand. As a result, devising a better strategy to boost housing prices would be difficult. Let’s break into what Scotiabank is on about. Pressure creates diamonds, but dead things are required first According to the bank, and the BoC has been attempting to reduce demand while the Fed has been attempting to increase it. The labor deficit in Canada is one of the most severe in decades. The bank views this as inevitable, given that the Fed has added 420,000 jobs since 2020. That is nearly similar to Halifax’s population and 51% of employment creation. It’s an unusual option for the Fed to boost its own employment program amid a labor shortage. According to Scotiabank, the same rationale is being applied to housing. The Fed says it wants to lower house prices but is actively attempting to raise them. “In a larger public policy perspective, Ottawa’s housing approach remains perplexing,” argues Derek Holt, VP and head of Scotiabank’s Capital Markets.”The Bank of Canada is attempting to limit inflationary pressures and cool previously blazing home prices.” The Fed has opened the floodgates to immigration into a market with no supply, while another tax subsidy to housing begins on Saturday in the shape of the first-time homebuyers tax-free home savings account, which enables one to store up to $40k tax-free with yearly payments of $8k. Housing will rip after a brief retrenchment, and so will the BoC’s efforts.” If you are not fluent in Bankster, this may need some unpacking to properly comprehend what is going on. Canada’s immigration policy is generous in the same way as the British West Indies were to India One of the most effective and mutually beneficial connections was Canada’s immigration program. Immigrants have always been quite successful in Canada. Regrettably, it is not the circumstance they are in right now. High-skilled immigrants are underemployed and living in substandard housing. There is a continual emphasis on how much immigration Canada needs, yet the government does not even have a plan for basic shelter. It’s evident that this is about increasing demand rather than a mutually beneficial development opportunity. Scotiabank is not alone in this regard. RBC, Canada’s biggest bank, has expressed similar sentiments. They said immigration is the quickest way to solve Canada’s demographic challenge. But it takes time; you can’t suddenly ratchet up the numbers and expect turnover. The bank cautioned that an increasing number of people without a strategy for work and housing would lead to increased inflation and higher housing prices. If you still believe this is 1980 and that immigrants gain by it, you are misinformed. Recent immigrants in Canada report feeling mislead, with two out of every five planning to return home. The government is governed like a sleazy business that exploits employees through a nefarious temp agency. They don’t care whether you can satisfy your fundamental necessities; they simply need someone to occupy the seat. A shady factory, on the other hand, may generate profits. Higher rents are a significant victory in this scenario. As borrowing rates fall, this may lead to greater housing prices. This weekend marks the start of Canada’s new tax subsidy to boost home prices Another artificial demand-side pressure described by Holt is the tax subsidy. In case you missed it, the First-Time Homebuyers Tax-Free House Savings Program begins tomorrow. It is a registered account, similar to your RRSP, RESP, or TFSA, that provides tax advantages for putting money aside for housing. Opponents felt that it was a flawed approach from the start. It is not intended to replace the current Home Buyers Programme (HBP), which enables first-time purchasers to borrow up to $35,000 from their RRSP. It also exists to encourage further home investment. How many Canadians have informed you that their house is their greatest investment? It most likely was. Since all the incentives are geared toward housing, they most likely made minor investments. As a result, Canadians have been investing less in production and more in non-productive asset trading. It’s become so terrible that Canada currently owns the OECD forecast slot originally held by Greece during the Great Recession. The siphoning of tax-based incentives had a significant part in driving up American property prices in the early 2000s. It also had a big impact on driving up Canadian property values after the 2019 election. The role of the asset holder in a market is to collect as much money as feasible. If the federal government is pushing you to invest more money into a property, the responsibility of the seller is to grab that extra cash. That’s how markets function, particularly regarding housing, which Canada regards as a bond you live in. Shelter and Financial Issues Also, additional leverage is being introduced into the real estate market. The price of an item is decided by what someone is prepared to pay, not by how many people desire it. Since housing in Canadian real estate market is mortgage-dependent, the role of finance has a significant effect in the price of a house. To appreciate this, you must first grasp how wrong economists were about interest rates. Lower interest rates, it is often assumed, decrease the cost of housing. The common myth among central bankers is that lower interest rates indicate more money flows to principle. The demand for available supply has a direct impact on home prices. Even the BoC has recognized it was a huge mistake. A BoC executive discovered that consumers adjusted their spending to credit after reviewing 30 years of data. They just continued to spend the same proportion of their income on the asset

Canadian real estate prices will “rip” higher: SCOTIABANK Read More »

Is it ok to invest in a home?

Blogs / / / , , , , , , , , , ,

Is it ok to invest in a home? As a homeowner, you have control over your living situation and financial future, rather than being at the whim of a landlord who can unilaterally decide to stop renting out the property at any time. Canadian real estate is a safe bet because of its historical trend of rising prices. According to Josh Davie, a financial advisor at Desjardins Financial Security Investments Inc., while owning a home is a desirable objective for many people, it is not the best choice for everyone. He states that it is dependent on the individual’s particular circumstances. If, for example, the future of your career is unknown and/or you anticipate moving in the near future, renting may be a better financial alternative for you because it allows more flexibility than buying a home. People who do not want to deal with the obligations that come along with house ownership, such as taking care of repairs and paying property taxes, may find that renting is a more suitable option for them. You shouldn’t feel pressured to purchase into real estate, as Davie suggests, especially if you believe you aren’t financially stable enough or don’t have the abilities necessary for effective financial management to handle the responsibilities of homeownership. Sharon Patton, a mortgage broker who operates in the Greater Toronto Area (GTA), is of the same opinion. “People who prefer more hands-off living are frequently better suited to renting since the landlord will maintain the property,” she explains. “People who want more hands-on living are often better suited to owning their own home.” If you don’t want to be responsible for paying for incidentals like property taxes, utilities, house maintenance, or unforeseen repairs, renting is the best option for you.

Is it ok to invest in a home? Read More »

BoC Index: Canadian Housing Affordability Unsustainable

Blogs / / / , , , , , , ,

BoC Index: Canadian Housing Affordability Unsustainable Even while Canadian real estate has never been cheap, it has rarely been this costly in recent history. For the third quarter of 2022, the Housing Affordability Index (HAI) published by the Bank of Canada (BoC) reached a new record high not seen since 1983. What this means is that it is extremely difficult for the typical American family to purchase a home anywhere in the country. Housing prices have reached an unsustainable high that has never been maintained for long. Mortgage Credit Availability Measure of Canada The Bank of Canada Affordability Index measures how much of one’s income would have to go toward housing costs. The real cost is likely more than what is reflected because only principal and interest payments and utilities are considered. The median annual take-home pay is utilized. The median list price for a home is calculated using data from the past six months. The mortgage interest rate is a composite of the discounted variable rate and the 1-, 3-, and 5-year fixed rates. Water, gas, and electricity are all examples of utilities that can be used as currency. It’s conceptually comparable to the RBC and NBF affordability indices. If the ratio is large, then purchasing and maintaining the home will be difficult financially. The BoC utilizes average income, which is typically higher than the median for households, in contrast to RBC and NBF. In addition, several indices employ the median rather than the average because the average fails to take into consideration quality and size. Many people rely on a benchmark pricing that already accounts for these factors. We do not think the Bank of Canada index accurately reflects the true costs of housing. Nonetheless, it’s helpful for validating trends and resting assured that the problem is being tracked. The fact that they actually care about the information it contains is another story. The Canadian Housing Market Is Becoming Less Affordable. The index shows that the cost of purchasing a home in Canada increased significantly during the past three months. In Q3 2022, according to the HAI, a typical family will need to spend 48.8% of its income on housing costs. Increases of 0.4 points from the previous quarter and 11.1 points from the previous year. Home price decreases capped the month-over-month gain. When it comes to the deterioration of affordability, however, an annual rise of more than 11 percentage points is still an outrageous move. It’s impossible for Canadian home prices to remain at this level for long The housing affordability index has never been this low. Only two quarters in the 1990s surpassed this level of income proportionality. Only eight quarters in the preceding half-century have been less cheap than the current one. Having a bubble that is comparable to two of Canada’s largest is, to put it mildly, undesirable. The indicator has hit an alarming level, as confirmed by a number of financial institutions. NBF issued a dire affordability warning earlier this month, saying it was the worst it has been since the 1980s. According to RBC’s estimates, our current level of affordability is worse than anything seen since the 1980s. There is no positive information to be found among any of these numbers. The upshot is the same: the cost of housing in Canada has risen to unaffordable levels. A number of businesses anticipate near-term deterioration but acknowledge there is always the possibility of things becoming better. This problem, however, has never lasted for very long. Countries where the typical family cannot afford a safe place to live typically offer a subpar value proposition.

BoC Index: Canadian Housing Affordability Unsustainable Read More »

Testing for Radon: 5 Frequently Asked Questions

Blogs / / / , , , , , , , , ,

Testing for Radon: 5 Frequently Asked Questions Certainly, you could have heard anything about radon before. You might even be aware that excessive levels of this naturally occurring gas can be harmful to your health if allowed to accumulate within your home. That’s a fantastic place to begin. However, if you’re worried about the security of your home and just know that much, you’re missing out on important information. Radon levels in a home can only be determined by conducting a test. Learn the answers to some of the most frequently asked questions regarding radon testing and take your radon knowledge to the next level. When should one conduct a radon test? Taking a radon test in the fall or winter will give you the most reliable estimate of how high the radon level is in your home. When we close our windows to block out the chilly air, we also reduce the airflow through our homes, which can lead to radon buildup. Therefore, this November is a great opportunity to start planning how you will address the risks posed by radon in your house. how do I run the test? It’s possible to pick from a few alternates. A DIY test kit is available at most hardware and home improvement stores. You might also visit your neighbourhood library (yes, you read that right). Borrowing radon detectors is possible from a wide variety of provincial libraries. Finally, if you opt to have a third party perform the test for you, double-check that they are a member of the Canadian National Radon Proficiency Program. If my numbers are higher than the Health Canada threshold, what happens then? Your radon levels should be reduced as quickly as possible if they are higher than Health Canada’s recommended level of 200 becquerels per cubic metre. In a fortunate turn of events, radon mitigation services can be found readily and at a reasonable price. If your home is less than seven years old, the new home warranty will pay up to $50,000 for radon mitigation costs. If you want to know how to receive help from the warranty service for the radon problem, click here. Can I skip the test if I just bought a new house? Yes is the short and straightforward answer. To find out if your new home has high radon levels, you should have the soil tested as soon as possible because radon is more related to the soil underneath your home than the age of your property. If you need to lower radon levels, you’ll be happy to know that many brand-new homes already have rough-ins for mitigation systems. What if my home has low radon levels? You don’t need to take any action to reduce radon if your levels are below the Health Canada limit of 200 becquerels per cubic metre. The key is to keep an eye on them throughout time because of the potential for change. After around five years, experts advise repeating the exam.

Testing for Radon: 5 Frequently Asked Questions Read More »

A new record in Q1 as the Pre Construction condo sales increase

Blogs / / / , , , ,

A new record in Q1 as the Pre Construction condo sales increase Condo sales have increased in the Greater Toronto Area and set a new record for Q1. It has increased by 55 percent and surpassed the 10-year average sales by 60 percent. The 10-year average sales were 5,164, which has raised to a new record. In the second quarter, new condo sales in the greater Toronto area rose to 9001 units which were 5.5times higher than the previous Q2 sales. Demand for new condo units has been rising over the last two quarters and the total number of transactions has become greater than the number of pre-sales units. Inventory that hasn’t been sold has faced a downfall of 34 percent over the last six months. Additionally, the unsold unit’s average price has increased by 16 percent approx to $31,382sq.ft and that too rose year over year. Still, the cost of construction and materials was increasing faster than the sales price and therefore it led to a decrease in the new activity. The demand for pre-construction condos was interesting to the next level but materials became more costly which is the reason for the reduction in the activity of construction. It has been reduced to 86,777 units in Q1 from 88,774 in Q4. The condo resale market is facing a change from the earlier quarter. The average price of a condo per sq. Ft in Q1 has increased by 12 percent. It was less than a quarter earlier. This is the rapid increase quarterly, which also results in the behaviour of buyers. The buyer is entering the market before the expected increase in interest rate. This results in an elevation of resale condo prices. It rose by 19 percent year over year in Q1 to $986 sq. Ft. It would make up to $811,000 for 824 sq. Ft. Which is 25 percent higher than its actual rate. The new condo market has started setting up a new record during Q1. The total sales for great Toronto area condo resale have increased by 74 percent year after year. So in the new condo resale market, prices grew faster and there they only increased by 13 percent: In 905 prices rose faster and reached 28 percent while in the outer area the prices increased by 22 percent. The buyer only focused on the outer region of 416 and 905 in search of value in condo sales where the price has an average rate of $7,66,000 in the 416 regions and $7,61,000 in the 905 area. With the demand for condo sales, there is an increase in resale activity. Including the new projects registered or completed in the past two years, there were 1058 sales in Q1 which was representing 17% of total resale. Related posts. A new record in Q1 as the Pre Construction condo sales increase by admin123 Construction worker’s strike affects high rise in GTA by admin123 A 69-Storey Stacked Tower is being proposed by Capital Developments by admin123 Another design being considered for site of demolished Giraffe Condos by admin123 A Proposal to Construct Three Towers Across from the Pioneer Village by admin123 The Finalization of 10Block Studio’s Plans for Luxury Condo by admin123

A new record in Q1 as the Pre Construction condo sales increase Read More »

Construction worker’s strike affects high rise in GTA

Blogs / / / , , , ,

The Finalization of 10Block Studio’s Plans for Luxury Condo 10Block Studio has recently submitted an application to the City of Toronto for Site Plan Approval in order to build a brand new luxury condominium tower that will be located at 65 George Street in the Old Town district of the city. The current application is a resubmission of an older one, and very few changes have been made to it since the first version of the application was submitted in April of 2017. At that time, the developer made an application to the City for a Zoning By-law Amendment in order to make room for the construction of a 17-storey building at 65 George Street that had been designed by Core Architects. This structure would be constructed at the back of a four-storey historic building at 187 King Street East, which will be preserved. The plan was for a total of only sixteen residential flats, with just one dwelling unit on each floor, and floor plates that measured 250 square metres apiece and the situation still prevails. The proposal was shot down by the City Council in October 2017, and an appeal against that decision was submitted to the Ontario Municipal Board in February 2018. (OMB). Following a settlement reached within the City in June of 2020 at a hearing known at the time as the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal. The appeal was ratified; however, the final order was withheld until certain conditions, as directed by City Council and as agreed to by the Owner, were satisfied. In December of 2021.The tribunal, which at this point was known as the Ontario Land Tribunal (OLT), reached the conclusion that they were in violation of the law and issued a ruling reflecting this conclusion “satisfied that a proposal is an appropriate form of infill intensification on an under-utilized site, which makes efficient use of land and transit. It sensitively balances heritage protection with new development and will assist in the fulfillment of provincial and municipal policies which speak to providing an appropriate range and mix of housing by providing large, family-sized residential units in the downtown area.” For the purpose of complying with the requirements of the SPA, the height of the building was brought down from 71.62 metres to 67.32 metres, although the number of storeys remained the same. On the other side, there are now 22 parking spots available, an increase from the previous total of 16. The historic structure located at 187 King Street East, also referred to as the Little York Inn was built in 1879 and has a total of four floors. In spite of the fact that the primary building was added to the heritage register in the 1970s, the original stable building that was built next door did not become a part of the record until the year 2020. Because of this, the new design also saves the brick exterior of the one-storey building at 65 George Street by incorporating it into the concept for the 17-story residential building that was developed by ERA Architects, who specialize in the preservation of historic buildings. It is proposed that the existing commercial and office use that is located within 187 King Street East will be kept, while the 16 floors proposed above the ground floor will each comprise one residential unit with two bedrooms and a den, with all but one of the units containing a private outdoor balcony or terrace. The ground level is going to have a whole new entrance for pedestrians, and it’s going to be reachable through the archway that’s been there since the beginning. This new entrance will be connected to a relocated vestibule and pedestrian lobby, and it will also be shared with the vehicular access to a parking elevator. A recreational space totaling 55.5 square metres is planned to be located on the mezzanine level, which will be connected to the lobby located on the ground floor. Related posts. The Finalization of 10Block Studio’s Plans for Luxury Condo by admin123 Canada housing plans considered vague by BMO by admin123 The Canadian Blind Bidding Ban Dilemma by admin123 Hamilton to witness the tallest building: 45 Storey Tower by admin123 Expert’s Reaction to the increasing rates by the Bank of Canada by admin123 Living in Main Floors- A Great matter of importance for Aging Canadians who want a Pleasant Life Ahead by admin123

Construction worker’s strike affects high rise in GTA Read More »

Canada housing plans considered vague by BMO

Blogs / / / , , , , , , , , , ,

Canada housing plans considered vague by BMO April 7th witnessed the release of the Canadian budget for the fiscal year 2022-23. Through the budget release, the Canadian government promises to enhance the housing conditions by making it more affordable and cost-efficient. The liberal party committed a few key measures, in case of re-election, that they will include a tax-free savings accounts for the first home for residents of Canada falling under the age of 40 years. A second promise is to double the home buyer text credit from $5000 to $10,000 to save on closing costs. The government has made commitments in order to speed up supply with the inclusion of $4 billion of investment in the housing accelerator fund in order to achieve growth in the annual housing supply. The federal government aims at the creation of 100,000 new, middle-class housing by the year 2024-25 and the conversion of void offices into residential components along side affordable build and repair With such eminent promises by the country’s government, came a warning from the economists’ bench. They called the dream of better and affordable housing in today’s market a dream far-fetched. Despite the Canadian Government’s full-fledged on-paper strategy, the economists are skeptical of such a plan and are calling it an impossible strategy or a political agenda that is not efficient enough to conceive itself. The Economists are reluctant to accept this plan and warn the people, who have hope in their eyes, to beware of the ‘extreme’ housing goals and the risks that could drown them with such a housing plan. Economists stand firm on the view that the federal government lacks an understanding of inflation costs that undergoes double home construction and states that the plan is too dismal to turn into reality. Most economists agree that the new housing plan determines the existing supply level to be negligible while dismissing the fact that one in ten dollars of the economic output of the country is spent on building houses. Here are a few economists who shared their opinions along with the reason why they think the new housing policies are the waves of hot air. Stephen Brown, a senior Canada economist at capital economics, feels that this plan is a demand-weighted strategy and that backfire is imminent. He analyses the situation and believes that for a less number of buyers a demand-oriented strategy could work but in the long-run housing will become expensive, dismissing the whale objective of the new plan. A certain Economist at BMO states the following reasons for their disagreement with the flow of the new housing plans – The skilled laborers and materials for the construction are in a shortage supply due to the fixed capacity of the Canadian building industry. If the production was to be doubled it’d result in a significant rate of inflation dismissing the entire goal of the campaign. It’s easier to talk about the zoning changes than to actually implement them in a real off-paper world. The economist warns about a strong political resistance. The federal government’s interference with the municipal committees will result in abuse of power. In the coming few years, Canada is likely to witness a change in its demographic structure. The millennials are currently peaking their demand needs which will result in low demand in the future. Moreover, the second half of the plan if would ever be conceived and implemented will result in housing for none. <br The said economist was also in high disagreement with the Ontario transit-oriented community project and housing plans. BMO economist titled the strategy as a way of pandering to a higher number of votes. In regards to the new housing plans, Brett House- deputy chief economist at Scotiabank believes ‘Policy efforts to stoke demand will only increase prices. All levels of government need to do the hard work together to enable an increased supply of appropriate housing with related services in Canada’s major cities.’ Angelo Melino, a professor at the University of Toronto, feels ‘You can’t improve affordability by subsidizing purchasers. This will just raise the price of the existing housing stock. Affordability requires an increase in the stock of low-cost housing.’ A chunk of economists praises the housing plans devised by the government as an admirable and an ambitious move but question the supply of workers needed to achieve the targets. Doubling production by cutting the extra costs seems like an intangible plan because of the rooted inflation that can devour the economy. Conclusion With such intricate views on one hand and the ambitious promises of the government, one needs to think if they should get their hopes high, think of this as a political agenda, and use their precious votes next time, or is there a grey area that everybody is missing on? The future is the only answer to all these questions and risks and decisions. Related posts. Canada housing plans considered vague by BMO by admin123 The Canadian Blind Bidding Ban Dilemma by admin123 Hamilton to witness the tallest building: 45 Storey Tower by admin123 Expert’s Reaction to the increasing rates by the Bank of Canada by admin123 Living in Main Floors- A Great matter of importance for Aging Canadians who want a Pleasant Life Ahead by admin123 National home prices historically higher, listings terribly low by admin123

Canada housing plans considered vague by BMO Read More »

Hamilton to witness the tallest building: 45 Storey Tower

Blogs / / / , , , , , , , ,

Hamilton to witness the tallest building: 45 Storey Tower The City of Hamilton is deciding to build a tower along its waterfront that would be the tallest in the city. The government has decided to take this step so that it can be considered a move towards higher density for the growing Southern Ontario City. However, after the announcement of this news, not all the residents are happy with this decision as some are claiming that building this tower will block sightlines. This 45-storey high tower will be designed by architect Bruce Kuwabara. The proposed tower will have two storeys more than the current tallest tower in Hamilton city. According to the government, this proposal is a major part of the redevelopment plan of over five hectares of land along the waterfront. This is to be built at Pier 8 into a new community. According to the proposal presented, the tower will occupy the northwest corner of the pier. This tower will contribute to more than 1,600 residential units, over 1,400 parking spaces that the pier is set to have after the redevelopment is completed and more than 13,000 square metres of commercial and institutional space. This tower will provide a beautiful view and it will be a landmark for the city of Hamilton city. The building announced on May 20th will be a part of the new Pier 8 redevelopment plan. The height of this building would challenge The Urban Hamilton Official Plan. The architect, Bruce Kuwabara, thinks the building would be considered a work of architecture for Hamilton city as a flagship and a landmark; especially for Pier 8. But the tower will work at the tip of Lake Ontario. Initially, it was designed that the tower should be cylindrical but later on, during a Design Review Panel, two more options were added and presented in front of Bruce Kuwabara. It is decided that the exterior of the building would consist of curves, giving a floral-like shape from a birds-eye view. This was the second design presented. The third design, named Lily, consisted of a more organic form due to its asymmetric and abstract shape. Bruce Kuwabara mentioned that the variations will give more meaning to the character of the building. The occupants will have different perspectives and experiences regarding what it is like to live in a building that has wavy patterns versus what it would be like to live in a building that would have softer, flatter and floral curves. But towards the end, the design of the building will be kept simple, minimal, and elegant as said by Bruce Kuwabara. As the tower would be the tallest building in Hamilton city, it will be visible not just from Hamilton but also from Burlington as well. One can view this tower from points around the bay, from LaSalle Park, and from down as well. This tower will be a landmark for Hamilton city, it doesn’t matter whether it’s the Waves, Cylinder or Lily. This tower will become a part of the image of the entire city of Hamilton in an intentional manner. However, though this tower will certainly be a new focal point for the city of Hamilton, not all residents are in support of the construction of this tower. After the Planning committee discussed this project in a meeting, a number of petitions were submitted against the construction of this tower. Some people commented that the city has not considered the potential issues that this tower will put on the neighbourhood. People said that the interference with the enjoyment of their property has been completely neglected by the government as a part of the current redevelopment process going on. People will not be able to enjoy the beautiful view of the waterfront and the traffic will be directed to Guise Street which would create a lot of issues for them. Even the issue of shadows of the tower being cast over nearby streets was also raised by some commoners. The North End Neighbourhood Association and Harbour West Neighbours Inc, however, supported this project and have raised their voices in support as well. In a letter to the Planning Committee, The North End Neighbourhood Association mentioned that if the government approves this construction of the tower then it will significantly lower the development density and allow housing purposes that will attract families from everywhere. By attracting families with children, it will benefit the neighbourhood and provide support to restaurants, education, retail, transportation services, etc. Listening to the comments and reviews of the people, Bruce Kuwabara has emphasized the point that, although people think that building itself is high-density, the entire level of land density for the parcel of land will not be changed. Bruce Kuwabara has named this thing “zoning”. According to this, it is not adding, not a land grab and increase in density. But rather zoning means the stabilization of density. In simpler terms, it means the distribution of those units over Pier 8. The design team has promised to ensure that the tower itself, although will be the tallest building in Hamilton city, will have the least amount of impact on its surrounding environment. Bruce Kuwabara has clearly stated that they are trying to make an elegant building. The very fork of it will be aerodynamic. The designers are very concerned regarding mitigating wind through design and they have decided that it will have comfortable outdoor amenity spaces. This 45-storey tall building will be iconic from the Pier 8 shoreline and it will symbolize progress in Hamilton’s growth. Yet to date, no legal approvals have been given to the project. Hamilton’s Design Review Panel will once again present the idea and discuss the proposal in a meeting that is scheduled to be held on April 27, 2022. The recommendation will be provided by the review panel but the ultimate decision will lie in the hands of the City Council. Related posts. Hamilton to witness the tallest building: 45 Storey Tower by admin123

Hamilton to witness the tallest building: 45 Storey Tower Read More »

April witnessed an increase of 8% in Canada’s housing starts

Blogs / / / , , , , , , , , , , ,

April witnessed an increase of 8% in Canada’s housing starts There was an increase of 8 percent in the number of homes that began being constructed in Canada last month, which is an indication that the housing sector in the country is heading in the right direction. According to the Canadian Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC), the trend in housing started to increase to 257,846 units in April from 253,226 units in March, when they had decreased marginally from the previous month. When calculating the trend, a moving average of the monthly Seasonally Adjusted Annual Rates (SAAR) of housing starts is utilized as the key metric. This parameter is measured over a span of one year and one month. According to Bob Dugan, the Chief Economist of CMHC, “On a trend and monthly SAAR basis, the level of housing starts activity in Canada remains historically high, hovering well above 200,000 units since June 2020 and increased from March to April,” The Canadian Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) utilizes the trend measure as a supplement to the monthly SAAR of housing starts in order to account for noteworthy changes in monthly estimates and to provide a clearer picture of the anticipated new housing supply. However, extreme caution is required when carrying out the measure in question. The Canadian Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) issues a warning “In some situations, analyzing only SAAR data can be misleading, as the multi-unit segment largely drives the market and can vary significantly from one month to the next,” Among Montreal, Toronto, and Vancouver, Toronto was the only market to post a decrease in total SAAR starts, which was driven by lower multi-unit and single-detached starts.” This statement was made in reference to the fact that the level of housing starts activity in Canada has remained historically high. The level of housing starts activity in Canada remains at a historically high level, holding far above 200,000 units, according to both the trend and the monthly SAAR basis. The seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR) of the total house starts across all Canadian regions in April was 267,330 units, which reflects an increase of 8 percent in comparison to the totals seen in March. In April, the seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR) of total urban starts increased to 245,324 units, which was a ten percent increase from the previous month. While there was only a one percent increase in the number of urban starts for single-family detached homes, there was a 14 percent increase in the number of urban starts for multi-unit structures, which brought the total to 178,092 units. After taking into account the effects that seasonality has, it was estimated that rural beginnings will occur at an annual rate of 22,006 units. At a time when many people blame a lack of supply as the primary perpetrator behind the housing problem in Canada, this is some positive news for the market in Canada. Related posts. Expert’s Reaction to the increasing rates by the Bank of Canada by admin123 Living in Main Floors- A Great matter of importance for Aging Canadians who want a Pleasant Life Ahead by admin123 National home prices historically higher, listings terribly low by admin123 Housing prices kicks off, stuck historically high, but trended lower in January by admin123 Soleil Condominiums by Mattamay to beam in Milton by admin123 As home prices rise, Ford wants to approve developments as soon as possible by admin123

April witnessed an increase of 8% in Canada’s housing starts Read More »

Construction worker’s strike affects high rise in GTA

Blogs / / / , , , ,

Construction worker’s strike affects high rise in GTA by Amy 15000 residential construction workers go on strike over wages and workers’ rights. This strike by the workers was the biggest in 20 years and this might have had a huge impact on the construction of ground and high-rise buildings in the Toronto Area. On Sunday, May 1st workers in GTA were covered by the labourers ‘ international union of North America local 183 went on strike and announced that workers were forced to go on strike. Multiple construction industry sector members refused the settlement which was proposed to them. Among members from different industry sectors included workers in high rise forming, house framing, installation of tiles forming, rail installation, self-leveling flooring, and hardwood installation were in this matter. This may result in affecting the process of Ground related and high rise residential projects in GTA. Due to the rising costs of living in Ontario, they have demanded fair compensation and a good amount of wages for its components. The workers of the residential sector in GTA deserve the fair compensation that they are demanding and their contribution and hard work reflect in the construction industry. The residential sector is one of the most demanded industries in the Great Toronto Area and other parts of Ontario and will continue to be in most in and for upcoming years. Thus in a press release LiUNA local 183 business Manager, Jack Oliveira said that their members work hard and are critical to building housing across the GTA. He further said that they are ready to come back for work but they just want to get their den and fulfilled and they want the contractors Association to provide their members with fair wages and compensation and accept a fair proposal that appreciates their members and for what they do. (RESCON )Richard Lyall, president of the Residential construction council of Ontario, a representation of residential builders, said that this strike is the most crucial that the sector has faced in around two years. According to him, in the residential construction sector, there are around 30z agreements and all collective bargaining expired on 30th April in The GTA. Many collective agreements have been settled or have achieved an uncertain agreement or some are still waiting for a fair agreement between the parties. LiUNA Local 183 has notified RESCON that its members have not accepted the proposals of settlements and go on a strike in the GTA and the other parts of Ontario. Richard Lyall, president of RESCON, is hoping to resolve this problem with the striking units in the next few weeks. Because according to him, the longer they strike, the more housing projects will be kept pending and the work will stop. Because of the workers who are skilled and are on strike, the other works are held up and cannot be processed further before completing the earlier one. The process of constructing a building is defined to be performed by different workers and so when they are on strike the others have to wait until these things have been resolved. RESCON mentioned that another union local representative of operative engineers has also denied and rejected a new collective agreement. It could affect excavation and other construction activities in the resident’s sector. But the province is urging them to resolve the settlement between both parties. The Ontario minister of labour stated in the press that they are encouraging the employers and the unions to make every effort on resolving their agreement at the bargaining table and they are pretty confident that by working together, both the parties can reach a settlement and resolve this issue. Related posts. Expert’s Reaction to the increasing rates by the Bank of Canada by admin123 Living in Main Floors- A Great matter of importance for Aging Canadians who want a Pleasant Life Ahead by admin123 National home prices historically higher, listings terribly low by admin123 Housing prices kicks off, stuck historically high, but trended lower in January by admin123 Soleil Condominiums by Mattamay to beam in Milton by admin123 As home prices rise, Ford wants to approve developments as soon as possible by admin123

Construction worker’s strike affects high rise in GTA Read More »